CO129-069 - Sir Bowring - 1858 [5-12] — Page 390

Ji

16281

of the charge has not been brought to His Excellenceprocathodin

explanation

or otherwise no explanation

could by any possibility have been required of mer When I wrote my note) to the Attorney Heneral I simply stated two facts;

one was that Mr Caldwell

as it appeared by therland Office To Books was the Crown Lesser of Lot W2 4LB on which Lot brothel 48 stood, and that the pecuspant of on adjacent house told

an

me

that Mr. Caldwell was the pioner Freceived

the pents; therefore at

3876

refore, that time Mr. Caldwell, was the

legal peigor of Lost 20/4 1B and the houses thereon, I altho hexplained the matter to Itis Excellency by stating that he was in procces of completing a pale of this Lot to Lum Akeen. it is very clear that no other than Mr Caldwell.

could be regarded as the oconer until the tran

the transfe

signed and delivered.

was signe

a communication had to have been made by: th= Durveyor General on the

Page 390Page 391